https://www.jamesrmeyer.com/otherstuff/easy-footnotes-for-web-pages.html#Fn_12_Codea

Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts

Sunday, March 5, 2023

Kat Blaque and some Polyamory research resources

 

Second place 2021 Image of the Year on Wikimedia Commons, Aulacophora indica looking out from a leaf hole.
But what do I see? It's the patriarchy wielding polygyny to rip apart the leafy fabric of sexual identities!


I saw a video by Kat Blaque today. Here it is: Does Polyamory Make You Queer?

A feminist video mentioning polyamory? Yay! 

No reading list? Not yay!

But, taking the video seriously. 

In my opinion, polyamorous civil rights are 30-50 years, or more, behind trans* and LGB civil rights. I take issue with this! I care the most about the civil rights and the broader societal acceptance of diversity in all its non-abusive forms. Such as: The colour of the sky at different places and times of the day, different expressions of intimacy and sexuality that all involved parties enthusiastically consent to, different shaped holes that bugs eat out of leaves. But not: sorting humans into boxes based on their personal preferences, or superficial differences, to decide which box is entitled to or deserving of resources.⁠ (Footnote: I think race is an excellent example of this kind of boxing people into arbitrary groups. And these two books offer an excellent recount of why this is so problematic for race specifically. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2014). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America (Fourth edition). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. Roberts, D. (2011). Fatal invention: How science, politics, and big business re-create race in the twenty-first century. New Press. )

Sunday, November 20, 2022

Explaining my choice of blog title

 

A male human head louse, and a featured picture (and prior Picture of the Day) on Wikimedia Commons. I wonder if this one will ever protest for their own civil rights in a way we can hear or understand.

I believe the most interesting research comes from questioning fundamental assumptions of a field. I also want it to also be as widely applicable while still being descriptive and faulting the model, rather than the counterexamples, if there is stuff that isn't explained well in the model. With that in mind, I'll explain the main reason for my choice of blog title.